Showing Up

August 24, 2011

My children are about to start their junior year in high school. Yesterday my daughter came to me; she was troubled by thoughts that she would not be academically successful this year. She is taking three advanced placement classes and the rest are honors courses. In addition, she feels the pressure of achieving high scores on her upcoming standardized tests such as the PSAT and SAT.

I asked her if she’d ever heard the saying “that 90% of life is showing up.” She said she had, but added, she didn’t understand what it meant.

Reflecting on the transition from freshman year to sophomore year, she had been surprised by the increase in workload and by the number of her friends whose class standing dropped precipitously. “What characteristic,” I asked, “did these free-falling students share?” She smiled. She understood that those who were high-honors freshmen but fell below the honor’s bar as sophomores had ability. They simply did not value doing the extra work required of them to maintain their high academic standing as sophomores.

My daughter began to relax; she saw her fate was in her hands. Almost certainly, I explained, she would have to do more work than in her sophomore year. But the good news was that if she did that work she would almost certainly succeed. I encouraged her to fully surrender to the process and enjoy the peace of mind that comes from that.

At the legendary Nick Bollettieri Tennis Academy, each student must sign a statement that reads in part: “Every endeavor pursued with passion produces a successful outcome regardless of the result. For it is not about winning or losing — rather, the asset put forth in producing the outcome.” Yet, practice “pursued with passion” often produces results; and graduates of Bollettieri’s academy include a virtual who’s who of tennis champions.

The irony is that often those who believe winning is everything are not prepared to expend the effort it takes to win. They believe that those who win do so because they are lucky or because they have prodigious talent. Fear of failure is the opposite side of the same coin as believing winning is everything. And often, those who fear failure do not show up and make an effort.

Psychologist Anders Ericsson is considered the world’s foremost expert on the causes of outstanding performances. Ericsson’s research shows that in all fields of endeavor, it takes at least 10,000 hours of deliberate practice in order to be a world-class performer. For example, he found that by the age of 20, the best violinist in the world had practiced at least 10,000 hours; while those aiming for careers as music teachers had practiced, on average, 4000 hours.

Ericsson’s findings were without exception: He found no world-class performers who had practiced less than 10,000 hours. And, everyone who had practiced 10,000 hours had reached elite status. Ericsson wrote, “We deny that these differences [in outcome and skill level]…are due to innate talent.”

Ericsson’s extensive research has been popularized in many fine books including Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin and Bounce by Matthew Syed; yet, many are skeptical. It seems that the mindset that some of us are more special than others is a hard one to overcome. That mindset results in celebrity worship and in living one’s own life without activating the potential within.

Why would anyone make such a choice? Human beings want to believe in their own specialness—even if their own specialness is a story of lack and victimization. We don’t want to hear that we are fundamentally all the same; we don’t want to hear that the only thing standing between us and mastery is long hours of practice.

Advertisements

After Housing: More Bubbles are Left

January 29, 2008

Consider this staggering statistic: In 2007 total credit market debt as a percentage of U.S. GDP was 343%–the highest in history. Yet day after day we hear “experts” pronouncing that the cure for our current economic troubles is to lower interest rates further—having the effect of creating even more debt.

We still do not have the collective understanding that a society grows rich by saving money and producing goods and services—not by extending artificially cheap credit. And since we lack that understanding, calls for bailouts of housing and other markets will continue.

Last week, Dallas Federal Reserve president Richard Fisher got it right when he said, “Our job is not to bail out imprudent decision makers or errant bankers, nor is it to directly support the stock market or to somehow make whole those money managers, financial engineers and real estate speculators who got it wrong. And it most definitely is not to err on the side of Wall Street at the expense of Main Street.” Unfortunately, Fisher is a lone voice in the Fed woods.

Although the term “bubble” is usually reserved for financial assets, if we understand a bubble to be fueled by unsustainable spending, we can understand there are other “bubbles” waiting to burst.

There is a health care bubble. Health care costs have risen to unsustainable levels. There are many reasons for this, but one that cannot be ignored is the fact that the current health care system does not encourage patient responsibility. An analogy would be if most automobile owners did not have even a basic knowledge of automobile maintenance and their foolishness was covered by insurance. Suppose most automobile owners never changed their oil; when their engines seized up, insurance simply paid for new ones. Suppose those who advocated common sense maintenance were routinely criticized for their unproven ideas. The outcome is clear—automobile expenditures would explode. All well and good, if you are a provider of engines and automobiles; not so good for the rest of the economy.

In Reclaiming Our Health, John Robbins writes:

I have come to realize that while doctors and medical technology have an important role to play in healthcare, they do not hold the ultimate secrets to health. Taken together, factors such as the food we eat, whether and how we exercise, the way we give voice to our feelings, the attitudes we hold, and the quality of the environment which we live are far more important to the quality of health we experience than even the most sophisticated medical technologies. It had been liberating to see that health comes from learning to live in vibrant harmony with ourselves, with the natural world, and with one another.

To understand how far we are collectively from understanding the basis of health that Robbins describes, consider Mike Huckabee’s weekend campaign quip in which he criticized Mitt Romney for peeling the skin off of his fried chicken: “I can tell you this, any Southerner knows if you don’t eat the skin don’t bother calling it fried chicken.” Without a health care “bubble,” in a country where heart-disease and obesity was common, presidential candidates would not be encouraging the consumption of toxic food.

There is an energy bubble. On a free-market there would never have been one gallon of ethanol sold in the United States. On a free-market there would never have been one nuclear power plant. Ethanol and nuclear energy are creations of complex subsidies. The capital that is being drained away by nonviable forms of energy helps to prevent entrepreneurs from discovering the next breakthroughs in energy. Just as no one had to direct entrepreneurs to discover oil as a replacement for whale blubber, government cannot direct the discovery of replacements for fossil fuels. The marketplace is in a continuous process of discovery; and no one knows whether solar energy, fusion energy, fuel cells, or a form of energy that we have never even heard of will be the replacement for fossil fuels.

Unfortunately, the energy bubble is still in its infancy. Just read this grab bag of energy promises that President Bush called for last night in his State of the Union address:

To keep our economy growing, we also need reliable supplies of affordable, environmentally responsible energy. Nearly four years ago, I submitted a comprehensive energy strategy that encourages conservation, alternative sources, a modernized electricity grid, and more production here at home — including safe, clean nuclear energy… And my budget provides strong funding for leading-edge technology — from hydrogen-fueled cars, to clean coal, to renewable sources such as ethanol.

There is an education bubble. These are glorious times to be an educator, if you are an associate superintendent or deputy superintendent or some other school administrator. Many of these jobs involve duties that, at best, are vague, and at worse, interfere with quality, classroom instruction. Yet all across the country, administrative budgets for public schools have exploded. If you have one of these jobs your livelihood depends upon convincing taxpayers that if they don’t increase funding for schools, they are hurting the children. Not allowing school choice guarantees administrative costs will continue to grow out of control. The movement to allow school choice has made little headway against the powerful public school lobby.

We may be many years from the time that these bubbles in health care, energy, and education will burst. Today, these bubbles are sustained by widespread illiteracy about health and economics. The transition years will not be pleasant; nonetheless, waiting on the other side of these bubbles is a vibrant, healthy, and sustainable economy.


%d bloggers like this: