A Prosperous Future for Al Gore, A Poorer Future for America

Suppose there was a man who lectured and wrote about the catastrophic consequences of climatic change to adoring audiences worldwide. Yet, suppose this man was so ignorant about basic facts of science that recently, when on the Conan O’Brien national television show, he promoted geothermal energy stating the inner core temperature of the earth was several million degrees and that there are drill bits that could withstand that heat. (If the earth was that hot at its center it would be a star. The actual core temperature is very speculative, but is estimated to be around 3000°C  to 7000°C. )

Further, suppose this man, who wants to control the lives of others, is an avid meat eater; even though if he switched to vegetarianism, he could shrink his carbon footprint by up to 1.5 tons of carbon dioxide a year. Further, suppose he has become so wealthy from his alarmist message that he owns a large home, and his home uses more energy in one month than the average household uses in a single year. Further, suppose he has convinced the government to subsidize a company in which he has invested, because the company makes an electric car that will sell for $89,000. Yes, according to the Wall Street Journal “A tiny car company backed by [this man] has just gotten a $529 million U.S. government loan to help build a hybrid sports car in Finland that will sell for about $89,000.” This man according to the London Telegraph could become the “world’s first carbon billionaire” after investing heavily in green companies receiving government subsidies.

You already know from the title of my post that I’m talking about Al Gore. You might wonder why anybody listens to him? A charitable interpretation would be that, even though he is a flawed human being like us all, people listen to him because they value his message about controlling the effects of man-made global warming. No doubt that is true of at least some of his followers. In my view, many are not cheering his message of “climate control;” they are cheering his message of “control.”

It is a dirty secret of academia; professors who cannot teach well but who do mediocre research that very few will ever read, can earn a very nice salary. On an unsubsidized free market, the value of their services would be much less than it is today. There would be no government grants and contracts for their research. Consumers (students and their parents) would be less tolerant of shoddy college courses; and if these professors couldn’t teach, they might find themselves without a job at all. Some people value and cheer any message of control—because it is in their economic self-interest.

Of course, professors receiving government grants and contracts are not the only ones who value any message of control. Mediocre artists who depend upon government grants for their livelihood value control. Government workers of all types, as well as union workers, who depend upon government privilege cheer for more controls. And now we have a growing class of business executives who instead of selling products valued by the market turn to the government for subsidies and bailouts. They too are in the corner cheering for Al Gore, because it means more handouts for them.

None of these people read my blog; and even if they did, they are unlikely to be convinced by the arguments I make. They have weaved a tangled nest of lies in their minds which allows them to justify seeking for wealth that other human beings have produced and that they have not earned. Barring some epiphany in which they clearly see the unrevealed values they live by, they will never be convinced to change their behavior.

But there’s another group of people who support controls—not because they’re trying to live off their fellow human beings—but because they are fearful of the world without controls. They believe for instance that we are running out of fossil fuels and that they will be cold at night if government does not subsidize new green fuels. Al Gore feeds off this energy of fear.

In his book The Origin of Wealth, Eric Beinhocker estimated that the complexity of the economy in New York City alone generates tens of billions of available products to New Yorkers. To many this is evidence of waste that should be controlled by government. After all someone might say, “Why do we need 500 kinds of breakfast cereals? Why do we need to be able to choose from hundreds of automobile models?” For many caring and economically illiterate individuals, it is natural to believe it would be better if smart people, like Al Gore, directed us to develop the “optimal” car model that was both safe and fuel efficient.

Beinhocker estimates, “Over 97 percent of humanity’s wealth was created just the last 0.01 percent of our history.” Complexity goes hand-in-hand with wealth creation—it is no spurious correlation. What seems to be a mess of competing products is what leads to the discovery of new, innovative solutions. Currently, there are literally tens of thousands of entrepreneurs working in the green energy field. Like Al Gore, some of those are not real entrepreneurs; they are simply political operatives getting wealthy off their political connections. They prevent real discoveries from taking place. Every dollar directed to them, is a dollar that the market cannot allocate towards viable solutions. In contrast, real entrepreneurs only make money when they serve the most urgent needs of the consuming public.

Al Gore may well be right in that geothermal energy may be an important part of our energy future. But, there are many different ways to harness geothermal energy, many yet to be discovered; just as there are many different ways to harness solar energy, many yet to be discovered. More importantly, just as no one ever heard of the internet company Amazon in 1990, there are forms of energy that we have not yet heard of that will change our lives in lasting and meaningful ways.

The more the likes of Al Gore gets to control, the poorer we and children and our grandchildren will become. Instead of being directed to the most promising new sources of energy—as it would be on a market system of profit and loss—energy resources will be directed to wasteful products, like Al Gore’s hybrid sports car.

Al Gore, like all of us, has a narrow mind filled with ignorance. The discipline of the marketplace reduces our ignorance and helps to direct our energy and our capital in the service of others. Those who do not understand this and those who feel a sense of entitlement that others should serve them want more controls. They want others to serve them more than they want to serve others. Of course, this is the age-old human story—human beings trying to live off the labor of others. To the extent that we collectively forget that this path leads to economic ruin, is the extent to which Al Gore’s future brightens while ours dims.

Advertisements

4 Responses to A Prosperous Future for Al Gore, A Poorer Future for America

  1. Steve P says:

    Barry,
    Is it any surprise that ignorance seems to lead to these co-dependencies between the Al Gores of the world and their supporters? Both share a sense of inadequacy in dealing with life’s challenges through productive achievement, seeking instead to take from their fellow man by force or fraud. This view of man as a means to the ends of others reflects their own views of themselves. How can liberty survive in such a toxic moral environment?

  2. Tesh says:

    Tangentially, have you heard about the latest “global warming” kerfluffle over a stolen email archive?

    http://market-ticker.org/archives/1651-Global-Warming-SCAM-A-Further-Look.html

    Interesting stuff, and if it properly checks out, it pokes some significant holes (moral and scientific) in the global warming arguments. Not that such would be a surprise to anyone really paying attention to the junk science and political motivations.

  3. James D. says:

    Its funny, but when I look closely at the graphs Al Gore presents in his movie, they show a repeating pattern, and the spikes he points to hold with the pattern. Anyway…
    If you want a different opinion, search for Bjorn Lomborg. He’s written a book called “The Skeptical Environmentalist” (as well as some others), that provide sound arguments that maybe we shouldn’t be screaming our heads off about the environment and our impact on it.
    In addition to the scientific debate (muffled as one side of it may be), I find there to be a more basic fallacy to the thinking of the chicken littles. Similar to politicians, scientists seek to have an effect on the world around them. If there is no effect, there is no purpose (read: no money) to what they’re doing, and they’d have to do something else. It behooves them for something to be “wrong”, at least enough to “warrant further research” (paid for by the gov’t no less.
    Another problem with their thinking is just how human-centric it is. As a species, we have been around for a tic of the second hand on earth’s clock. There is evidence that there have been at least 2 other extinction level events (both caused by large meteors slamming into the earth) that have wiped out the bulk of the existing life on this planet and changed the field in favor of a new group of species being dominant. We would be beyond hubris in our thinking if we believe that such an event could no happen again and wipe us out as well.
    They say that we are “stressing” the planet and “straining the ecosystems”. I am certainly not the wisest fellow around, but one thing I do know, is that Mother Nature always wins. If we push her beyond what she’s happy with, she’ll push back and restore her own level of balance. To think that we can “save” the planet is arrogant, because she can take pretty good care of herself. It is we who are insignificant, who have only been here a brief while and are living here only by the whim of forces (deific or secular) we cannot understand.

  4. Steve, Tesh and Jim,

    Thank you for your thoughtful comments. All three of you are pointing us in the same direction–examine the insane nature of our collective ego that thinks it can live off others and that thinks it can control.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: